|
|
Post by lyodmackenzie on Jan 28, 2006 21:09:22 GMT
The GDP wants to change the name of Nova English Korea to either North Nova Crown Colony or Assiniboine what do you prefer?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 28, 2006 21:30:07 GMT
Yeah, but with out the Nova, so Northen Crown Colony (NE)
|
|
|
|
Post by king Joseph I on Jan 28, 2006 21:34:34 GMT
Yer
|
|
|
|
Post by Wucubby, C o f E on Jan 29, 2006 11:56:58 GMT
wats the point of chaingin the name?Why dont we just leave it like it was before?
|
|
candy
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by candy on Jan 29, 2006 12:15:50 GMT
i like the first name better!theres no point in changing it,i think,who agrees?  |
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 29, 2006 12:40:32 GMT
Thats true acually, there no real point in renaming North Korea 'South East China' is there
|
|
|
|
Post by lyodmackenzie on Jan 29, 2006 13:29:09 GMT
These names represent our country to the rest of the world. By having a bad name you will lose respect. Having an original name that sounds professional is the same as having a smart and professioal website. Also these names make it seem like this is an "English Patriots club". We should think of a new name that represents us as a country. Not one allready used by a real country just merely calling it "NEW". These names are representing England not this country.
|
|
|
|
Post by lyodmackenzie on Jan 29, 2006 13:32:24 GMT
As Great as England and Korea are. They are seperate countries completely different to this one. We should start making us more unique by renaming our Colonies. We change it to be differnet from the rest and to stand out as unique from the many others.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 29, 2006 13:44:21 GMT
Yeah, BT BK is a colony, in the area of Middle Korea, hence it derives its name from its surroundings, and si it became Brittanic Korea.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Plunkett on Jan 29, 2006 14:49:05 GMT
What is the point in wasting valuable time on changing the names of already established countries when ur party should be focusing on the gd it is going to do for the country as whole i c no benifit in changing the names. Wot will it do?
Oh and by the way South America is so because it is SOUTH OF AMERICA!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 29, 2006 15:03:35 GMT
Words of Wisdom from the general
|
|
|
|
Post by Wucubby, C o f E on Jan 29, 2006 19:17:30 GMT
I agree wid the general definately. Thers no point in watsing time on names that are established when we cud b doin somethin much more useful 4 the country like changing afew of the laws, starting from the method of elections which is alredy being put to vote thanx to the work of the NEPD
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 29, 2006 19:22:52 GMT
exactly well said wucubbisnom iorosnom
|
|
|
|
Post by lyodmackenzie on Jan 29, 2006 23:54:32 GMT
Not much time wasted I think merely a few minutes. perhaps your dreams of hackers commandos raiding other ppls sites are a waste of time. Changing the name is a definant change. IF we are elected that will be the first thing we will do rename the colony.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 30, 2006 19:48:46 GMT
Actually its already in action  |
|
