|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 22, 2006 15:35:30 GMT
Well the thing with Lovely is it went on TV. If we at NE got a spot on ITV, im sure our membership would rocket...And they have some hardcore fans yeah, but if all the micronations that were origninally disgruntled did rise up and attack, then no doubt, we would take over.
But what would that acheive?
|
|
|
Post by drspangle13 on Jan 23, 2006 15:25:22 GMT
the problem with lovely is not that they were on tv nor is it their ruler or their land or citizens or their popularity it is the foreign office you cannot get an alliance i know having asked twice but what i need is to talk to the one in command danny wallace, but, he is making a movie and is busy so i shall wait but i will not give up!
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 23, 2006 16:01:11 GMT
still hard though because of the amount of traffic!
|
|
|
Post by General Plunkett on Jan 25, 2006 23:26:15 GMT
What role does the RPMP play in foreign policy?
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 26, 2006 0:49:38 GMT
None. You're only there for emergencies. Current Foreign policies dont feature mass exansionism, they feature alliances and friendships and the like...So atm, your purely for defence issues. Sorry
|
|
|
Post by General Plunkett on Jan 26, 2006 0:59:40 GMT
OK however i dont see y the RPMP can not be more activily involved in foreign policies and not just an emergency organisation sitting there basically doing nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 26, 2006 1:20:38 GMT
Because at this time, military action is not required. We do not need to be a massive military organisation. There is no call for it. We are peace loving people here at NE, and in the near future look to be staying that way.
|
|
|
Post by General Plunkett on Jan 26, 2006 2:18:27 GMT
Surely if there are oppotunities to expand we should take them, or r u against the expanision of this great nation, do u have ur own political motives in seeing this nation not expand!
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 26, 2006 10:49:42 GMT
Well, we cant expand really, we have a small army, our neighbours are our allies, if we attacked them, theyd bring the weight of various alliances down on us and it would be the end of NE. IS this what your working towards?
|
|
|
Post by General Plunkett on Jan 26, 2006 11:56:36 GMT
Why would we have to attack our neighbours surely we have enimies out there can we not just go out and attack. Wot r the reasons for only being able to attack our neighbours (which we would not do for the security of our nation) I must emphasise that i have need or want to c NE fail and crumble all i am doing is puttin forward points and questions. I dont c any reason to turn wot i see as valid points, against me as though i am something bad for this party!
|
|
|
Post by General Plunkett on Jan 26, 2006 11:57:40 GMT
Error: last line "party" was meant to be "country"
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 26, 2006 21:54:29 GMT
Im now bringing in Luvinum to help with the NEDP foreign policy decisions
|
|
|
Post by luvinum on Jan 26, 2006 22:50:04 GMT
Thank you. now i would like to start off by saying, that war is not the only way our nation can expand. The whole point of a foreign office, is to secure connections with other countries, and hopefully get people to convert nations in join us. Starting pointless wars for ur greedy desires, are not somthing that this government wud like to participate in.
|
|
|
Post by Sir Chris Barrett on Jan 26, 2006 23:19:31 GMT
That is exactly the sentiment that we in the NEDP show! We feel that perhaps warring to expand is pointless, when the MCR can give us the land bloodlessly. Why die, when we get given all we need, when we need
|
|
|
Post by luvinum on Jan 26, 2006 23:35:36 GMT
exactly, and quoting sum1 famous, god knows who, 'the tounge is mightier than the sword' i think is a brilliant quote that works well here.
|
|